<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Clutter Free Coding</title>
    <link>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com//site/index/</link>
    <description>You.Theory.Experiment.Theory.You</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>blogging@urartutech.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-02-09T23:38:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>What, Why and How</title>
      <link>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/what_why_and_how/</link>
      <guid>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/what_why_and_how/#When:23:38:56Z</guid>
      <description>What you want ?  Why you want that ?  How this accomplishes that ?  These 3 questions surface fluffy stuff for direct discussion.  &#160;</description>
      <dc:subject>Something</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-02-09T23:38:56+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Creativity</title>
      <link>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/creativity/</link>
      <guid>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/creativity/#When:22:03:42Z</guid>
      <description>XP says that these values are important: Communication, Simplicity, Feedback, Courage, Respect, Rules of Engagement.  Sometimes I envision stuff and after fully understanding it I realize how over complicated my initial expectations were. Have you experienced that sometimes ? Did these wild things end up simpler at the end?  How can one avoid over complications ? Are there people who are less mature but can be creative? Children for example? Maybe them? Maybe you sometime ago? Do you remember when you were a child and how creative you were?  There is a quote about children:  “Democracy cannot survive without the guidance of a creative minority.” &#45;Harlan Stone</description>
      <dc:subject>Nothing</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T22:03:42+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Information vs. Understanding</title>
      <link>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/information_vs._understanding/</link>
      <guid>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/information_vs._understanding/#When:21:58:23Z</guid>
      <description>Information. We are living in an Information Age. There is a lot of data that we eat every day. Social Networks, TV, PlayStations, Radio, more medias.  What would be the next Age ? Understanding Age?</description>
      <dc:subject>Nothing, Everything</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T21:58:23+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>aha moments</title>
      <link>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/aha_moments/</link>
      <guid>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/aha_moments/#When:21:42:02Z</guid>
      <description>My aha moments or things that I wanted to remember from Alistair’s training.  “Why TRUST?”. In business one can setup relationship to take out human factor out.  “Programming is a mapping of Theory1 to Theory2”. Theory1 is product theory, Theory2 is programmer’s Theory.  “SCRUM Framework is for surfacing problems”. No surprises during project development.  “SCRUM Master is Oil and Glue”.&#160; You need someone who is running around programmers, marketing and other stakeholders, resolves issues, connects, translates that with this and brings it back to engineers. So programmers keep coding useful stuff and stay clear when doing it.  &#160;  &#160;  &#160;</description>
      <dc:subject>Nothing, Everything</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T21:42:02+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Gravity</title>
      <link>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/gravity/</link>
      <guid>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/gravity/#When:21:39:26Z</guid>
      <description>I picked up this comparison from Alistair. He says that he trusts Gravity. There are physical rules that happen in software projects. When these rules of Gravity are not respected, then projects fall.</description>
      <dc:subject>Nothing, Everything</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T21:39:26+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Alistair</title>
      <link>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/alistair/</link>
      <guid>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/alistair/#When:21:38:16Z</guid>
      <description>Just passed 3 day training for SCRUM with Alistair Cockburn.   If you want to learn to be more effective learn it from Alistair.  Salt Lake City University:</description>
      <dc:subject>Nothing, Everything</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T21:38:16+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Is Smart Work important ?</title>
      <link>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/is_smart_work_important_/</link>
      <guid>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/is_smart_work_important_/#When:21:06:24Z</guid>
      <description>How would you know ?  Maybe the hard work that you just did was a smart work. So you are achieving at maximum capabilities. You should feel good then. Feeling good is important. When you feel good you can work even harder, longer and smarter.  But how would you know if you can do things more efficiently, faster and simpler ?</description>
      <dc:subject>Nothing, Everything</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-01-15T21:06:24+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Context</title>
      <link>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/context/</link>
      <guid>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/context/#When:19:35:00Z</guid>
      <description>Definition: the set of facts or circumstances that surround a situation or event  Per mind map, the context can be looked as a node in a hierarchy of contexts.   Depending from organization of the mind map, 2 people can have 2 different contexts even with same original data.  &#160;  &#160;  &#160;  &#160;  &#160;  &#160;  &#160;  &#160;  hidden</description>
      <dc:subject>Something</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-01-14T19:35:00+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Stretching</title>
      <link>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/stretching/</link>
      <guid>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/stretching/#When:22:30:45Z</guid>
      <description>Communication is NOT what you do. Communication is what the other person understood.  You want to stretch yourself to connect with the other person.    &#160;  If Software groups would stretch themselves to connect with Marketing groups, then better requirements can get squeezed out. And vice versa, Marketing can stretch to Software to ensure that product is understood as communicated.  During stretching interesting things can happen at different places at different times.</description>
      <dc:subject>Something</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-01-12T22:30:45+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>looking for Problems</title>
      <link>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/looking_for_problems/</link>
      <guid>http://www.clutterfreecoding.com/site/looking_for_problems/#When:21:19:05Z</guid>
      <description>When looking for problems, you usually find them. You fix problems and look again for problems. You find new problems, and fix them also.  See more for diligence.</description>
      <dc:subject>Nothing, Everything</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-01-12T21:19:05+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>
